⚠️ On Friday 31 December, the EU Commission proposed to declare nuclear power and fossil natural gas as "sustainable investments". This will put climate neutrality and Europe's energy transition into question. Billions of euros would flow to gas and nuclear energy pretending that it is just as good as renewables for the climate and environment, while it is clearly not. The energy transition must not fall victim to greenwashing!
While the negotiations of the EU’s “Fit-for-55” climate package are in progress, a fatal decision is looming. The climate neutrality and sustainability of Europe's energy supply is at stake. Specifically: New nuclear and gas power plants are to be classified as “sustainable investments”. This would mean that gas and nuclear energy would be painted green and cash floodgates would be opened for these energy sources. It would send the EU’s climate and energy policy on a completely wrong path!
That's what it's about in detail: The European Commission has been working for months on a new EU standard for sustainable investments, the so-called EU taxonomy. This standard will, for example, define which energy sources are considered sustainable. So the taxonomy is a sustainability label. The classification as a sustainable investment has immense consequences: In the future, not only banks, insurance companies and other financial market players will base their investment decisions on this EU standard, but also small investors. And not only that: European and national subsidies and taxpayers’ money would also flow into nuclear power and gas if these energy sources were given the sustainability label.
This is so important because Europe currently has to transition its energy supply to climate neutrality. The role of gas and nuclear power is a heated argument among EU member states. Energy sources that are classified as sustainable by the EU will be very popular in the next few years. If an energy source is not part of the EU taxonomy, it will not be banned, but it will be much more difficult to finance it.
The meltdown occurred at the EU summit on October 22nd: EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen announced that she would in a short time present a proposal for the EU sustainability label, which also includes nuclear power and gas. So far she had always spoken out against nuclear and gas in taxonomy. The result: New nuclear power plants and even gas-fired power plants that are not state-of-the-art could hope for a windfall. Investments in nuclear power and gas would therefore get almost the same sustainability label as the construction of wind turbines and solar systems. A meltdown for renewable energies!
The European Commission surrendered at the last EU summit and gave in to the greenwashing of nuclear power. In this way, a decision for gas and nuclear power in the EU taxonomy could now come within a matter of days. It all depends on Ursula von der Leyen's EU Commission and her proposal for sustainability rules. By painting nuclear and gas green, Ursula von der Leyen and her First Vice-President Frans Timmermans would also break the promise of their own “European Green Deal”. It would be the first clear change of course on Europe's path to climate neutrality - a departure from actual sustainability and the 1.5 degree target!
Once the European Commission has presented its proposal, it would need a so-called “qualified majority” among the EU member states to stop the project. That is practically hopeless. So please sign this petition and support the demand made by President Ursula von der Leyen and Vice-President Frans Timmermans: The generation of electricity from nuclear power and gas is not sustainable. Nuclear and gas must therefore not be classified as sustainable investments within the framework of the EU taxonomy!
Michael Bloss 🇩🇪 - Bas Eickhout 🇳🇱 - Ernest Urtasun 🇪🇸 - Damien Careme 🇫🇷 - Yannick Jadot 🇫🇷 - Michèle Rivasi 🇫🇷 - Eleonora Evi 🇮🇹
Members of the European Parliament for the Greens/EFA
Why? New investments in fossil activities such as gas-fired power plants are incompatible with the goal to achieve carbon neutrality in 2050 as the UNEP and the International Energy Agency have recently confirmed. [It is inconsistent to incentivise private gas investments when at the same time the EU rightly called for the ending of fossil subsidies at the COP26].
Why? While nuclear energy produces relatively few greenhouse gas emissions, the nuclear waste remains dangerous for generations to come. Uranium mining and milling, and the storage and disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel do not respect the Taxonomy law requirement to prevent significant harm to any environmental objective. As this study proves, there is no legal base for including nuclear energy in the EU taxonomy.
Investments in nuclear energy would come at the expense of investments in energy efficiency measures and the deployment of renewable energy such as wind and solar which lead to much faster greenhouse gas reductions. Even the financial label of the pro-nuclear French government itself, does not consider nuclear energy a sustainable investment.
In addition, electricity from renewable energies is already cheaper than nuclear and gas more and more often. Renewables are becoming cheaper, nuclear and gas more and more expensive. Those who now rely on nuclear and gas will reap higher electricity costs for private consumers and businesses.